In the United States, there are thirty-one states in support of the death penalty and remaining nineteen states are against the death penalty law. If to refer to the list of pros and cons, it seems more positions against capital punishment, but this is only because of the emotional issue of the execution, essay for death penalty. Instead it gives the society a essay for death penalty to revenge. Capital punishment is a very serious issue, which is worth detailed discussion and analysis. This paper argues that the death penalty should be abolished because it is not one of the best methods of punishing criminals and addressing crime.
Related topics
Disclaimer: This paper has been submitted by a student. This is not a sample of the work essay for death penalty by professional academic writers. Any opinions, findings, essay for death penalty, conclusions or essay for death penalty expressed in this work are those of the authors and do not necessarily reflect the views of StudySaurus. In the United States criminal justice system when a human being takes the life of another human being there are roughly two options for consequences; Life in prison with no possibility of parole or the death penalty. So, in regard to the death penalty, morality can define what justice may to be in a criminal punishment.
Individuals who believe it is morally right to put an individual to death over a horrendous crime support the retentionist argument for the death penalty. Individuals who believe it is morally wrong to kill an individual, essay for death penalty, despite the crime committed are in support of the abolitionist argument of the death penalty. In the United States, there are thirty-one states in support of the death penalty and remaining nineteen states are against the death penalty law. As the death penalty can be a controversial topic is it important to consider all possible factors. The best approach to the death penalty is the principle of human dignity.
The principle of human dignity is an argument in abolishing the death penalty. The principle of human dignity presents an argument that gives all individuals equal rights regardless of decisions made in a essay for death penalty act. The principle of human dignity is an argument that a human being, in virtue of just being a human or person has intrinsic worth. This argument means that a human being is a human being and should always be treated as one. No matter the crime committed, one does not forfeit their right to life even if they have taken one. This argument in abolishing the death penalty can agree with tortures should not be tortured, drunk drivers not being hit with a vehicle, and individuals who are accused of arson should not be set on fire.
The consequences for those crimes are excessive; the same thing occurs when in regards of the death penalty. When placing the idea of an eye for an eye on various crimes is seems extreme and unnecessary. A life for a life is excessive. Criminals do forfeit some rights to life, but not all rights to life. Punishments will happen for individuals essay for death penalty these crimes, but there are punishments that fit the crimes being committed. For example, life essay for death penalty prison with no possibility of parole fits the punishment of first degree murder.
The principle of human dignity directly goes directly against the element of reciprocity. The element of reciprocity explains that we can forfeit our rights by our own actions. The human dignity argument has the idea that human dignity should always be reserved, essay for death penalty. Human essay for death penalty are given to an individual when born should be modified when committing crimes but never forfeited. Individuals should never lose their respect for human dignity. Good or bad actions, all humans have emotions and can feel pain; at somewhat the same level. Individuals who do not agree with the principle of human dignity are in support of the death penalty. There are many factors that morality support the death penalty.
Supports are in favor of taking the life of someone who committed a horrendous crime; a life for a life. Individuals who do not agree with the human dignity argument may attempt to argue that the death penalty is an effective consequence because it deters other criminals from committing the crimes. Continuing, it may be argued that the death penalty can show society its moral outrage at unpleasant crimes. Resulting in a decrease in the crime rates. Although this seems efficient, an individual who commits a crime already knowing the consequences. Life in prison with no possible chance of parole is enough to deter an individual of a crime who does not want to seek punishment. Other supporters of the essay for death penalty penalty derive more from government than society.
The government is considerably more in favor of the death penalty because of the costs. This argument is important to the government because it saves the government more money. Morally, essay for death penalty, this is the most incorrect argument regarding the death penalty. No amount of money is equivalent to the life of a human being. The death penalty is the wrong consequence more many reasons. Although, individuals are rarely put to death for crimes they did not commit, it does happen. To avoid wrongfully killing an individual for a crime they did not commit, the death penalty should not be used a punishment.
Technology continues to advance every day. Scientist are figuring out new technology and experiments as we speak. If new advances in technology regarding the criminal justice system were to be discovered and the death penalty was not implemented, an individual would gain their rights and freedom back. A wrongfully committed individual can be released from prison, not brought back to life. Not all, but some crimes can be justified. The death penalty is such a controversial topic there will never be a correct answer. The arguments are all based on morals and views, essay for death penalty. Although there is no correct answer, essay for death penalty, there is a better answer.
The human dignity argument gives all humans, equal rights; regardless is one made a criminal mistake or not. All humans have human dignity. And some that die deserve life. Can you give it to them? Then do not be too eager to deal out death in judgement. According to Berman there were several officials begging for them to change the pace of executions because it imposes stress and trauma Berman. This proves that carrying out several executions can take a severe toll on correction officers wellbeing. This proves that when working as a correction officer and you have to execute people it can be very traumatic and hard to get over which causes stress. Another reason why the death penalty should be repealed is because it is extremely expensive.
This proves that the states are spending billions of dollars just to execute people when that money could be going towards something more beneficial. This proves that the cost of housing just one single death row inmate is very expensive. If housing just one is millions of dollars, than imagine how much money it is when essay for death penalty multiple. This shows that capital cases cost a lot of money and is very expensive. It cost way more than it would cost if it was just life without parole. Another reason why the death penalty should be repealed is because it kills innocent people.
This quote proves that over people has been put on death that are innocent. According to Holloway there was this man name Henry McCollum, who was in prison for 30 years on death row for the murder of an 11 year old girl which evidence showed that he did not do. This case proves that some death row cases are unfair and they convict innocent people. Even though many people feel that the death penalty should be abolished, there are many people who support it, essay for death penalty. People who support the death penalty says it saves lives. Rubin, and Joanna M. Even though many think it will bring closure, it can also bring stress and trauma on others such as those involved.
The death penalty is senseless and discriminatory. It brings nothing but stress, debt, and innocent lives lost. StudySaurus is run by two uni-students that still get essay for death penalty kick out of learning new things. We hope to share these experiences with you. Stuck on Your Essay? Search For Search. Home Knowledge Base Popular Essay Topics Death Penalty Essay. Essay for death penalty Essay on Against the Death Penalty In the United States criminal justice system when a human being takes the life of another human being there are roughly two options for consequences; Life in prison with no possibility of parole or the death penalty.
Capital Punishment Essay J. Was this material helpful? Yes No. Leave A Comment? Cancel Reply, essay for death penalty. About StudySaurus Community. error: Content is protected!!
abortion should be legal essay
For a person to have committed murder in most cases it means there is a line of other crimes he has done and all the victims in each would be relieved to finally get justice and it means that justice for the past and current crimes is served. A death penalty deters prisoners serving a life imprisonment. They could murder people when in prison. Other life imprisoned persons could escape and continue killing people outside as a way of revenging. A death sentence is the only effective deterrent in such cases Haag, Due to the advancement of technology there is a very minimal possibility of error. All doubt cannot be cleared but recently it is very close. If a life imprisonment is passed there could be a possibility of prisoners escaping or parole.
This would give them another opportunity to kill. The ultimate reason for a death penalty policy is to avoid repetition of the crime. The system of parole does not make sense. Sentencing a prisoner to life means overcrowding in the prison systems which over exploits the resources there; cell portion, clothing, guard time, and food. If the option of death penalty is removed then the prisons will have a problem of overpopulation because these criminals are there for life. A death penalty gives prosecutors a chance to bargain a plea with the defendant. This makes the defendant admit to the crime in exchange for a lenient sentence. It is difficult to get a criminal to take blame in a court of law but a death sentence does. It is an advantage because the persons arraigned in court are already guilty.
A plea bargain saves on time, personal requirements and costs of a criminal case. Death penalty existence thus gives power and flexibility to prosecutors to ensure justice. Capital punishment is a very serious issue, which is worth detailed discussion and analysis. A century ago it was a common way of punishment for murderers, and today more and more people start considering that it is illegal, unjust, uncivilized and immoral. While discussing the topic of capital punishment, the arguments of Ernest van den Haag, Jeffrey H. Reiman, and Gregg Georgia should be regarded.
Professor Ernest van den Haag is one of the most famous pro-death penalties academics. His arguments concerning the capital punishment seem to be the strongest. According to him, it is much better to execute a murderer needlessly than risk the life of an innocent person. Van den Haag supposes that a person that has committed such a crime is to be expelled from the community of living and dehumanized. Death penalty is a way to deter murderers, and statistically it helps save one human life per year. He tries to emphasize that death penalty should be abolished. Unlike van den Haag, he generalizes the data and expresses only his subjective viewpoint. He does not provide any statistics, real facts, being armed only with his own attitude.
The same concerns Gregg Georgia, he holds by an opinion that capital punishment is excessive and immoral. He tries to explain reasons of this immorality and criticizes the justification of this kind of punishment. It is immoral, and punishing for this is a necessary thing. History proves that the crimes to which the capital punishment has been awarded often seem unfair, unjust and frivolous to some extent, but times have changed. The investigation lasts till the dissection of all evidences and is given only after deep consideration of the matter.
So we can state confidently that the capital punishment nowadays is awarded after a lot of discretion and thought. where according to the Constitution each state can formulate its own policy. Although some states like Illinois have recently imposed a moratorium till the end of the investigation. The capital punishment is not given for the murder only. The list includes treason, murder, repeated aggravated assaults and terrorism. In most countries, the death sentence is a method of political dissent and suppressing crimes. During the war time, it is given for treason due to the fact that it means loss of life in most cases. Acts of terrorism cause great number of people to be killed or injured, therefore, is awarded the capital punishment.
Execution is also imposed on people who have been convicted of brutal rape, manslaughter or aggravated assaults, as well as to people who have served a punishment and repeat their crimes again. In , the Universal Declaration of Human Rights was adopted by the United Nations to promote justice, peace and fundamental rights as the foundation of freedom in the world. The question that is constantly discussed since that time is whether the capital punishment is justified. If it is then what sort of crime would lead to a death sentence? In , Massie murdered a woman after robbing her house. He was sentenced to death, but then commuted to life imprisonment so Massie could testify against his accomplice.
Eight months later Massie was paroled and murdered a businessman Boris Naumoff and previously having robbed him. Therefore, taking into account all the arguments for and against, to my mind, the capital punishment is completely justified in cases of serious crimes. Thomas Aquinas n. Augustine and St. Thomas in Favor of the Death Penalty. Researchers Reiman and Georgia criticize him, but their arguments seem to be rather unconfident. But as a matter of principle, they are also right. And this is not an issue of moral or ethics; it is an issue of human rights. The problem of capital punishment is therefore multi-sided and does not have clear-out solution.
To my mind, there is a line morality which cannot be crossed. If to refer to the list of pros and cons, it seems more positions against capital punishment, but this is only because of the emotional issue of the execution. In fact, there have been cases when prisoners escaped and killed again. However, I do not consider that life imprisonment without parole could adequately protect the public. Capital punishment would remove that danger once and for all. In case you have considered our essay sample a great piece of writing and you would like to get the similar one, you are welcome to order an essay on death penalty EssaysMasters. See why thousands of students have chosen us as their custom essay writing provider. I gave a writer a very short time frame, but he wrote with my paper very fast and I received it in time!
It is very great for me. Thanks a lot for writing my dissertation chapter. Your writer saved my reputation! Due to personal problems, I did not have time to finish my work and panicked a lot. I got peace when turned to you for help. I was impressed with the excellent quality of writing produced by your professionals. I am delighted with the result I got. I received dissertation from this writing service today. It very good sample for my dissertation work. Only good opinion about our partnership, thanks. I am deliriously happy to have cooperated with EssaysMasters. Your service exceeded all of my expectations. A really nice custom writing service although some writers could perform better.
Still, the price is affordable and any student can place an order here. Home Death Penalty Pros and Cons Essay. By essaysmasters Death penalty Introduction Death penalty is a kind of capital punishment which follows a legal process in prosecuting and killing people through the state for the crime the committed especially murder. Get a price quote. Type of your assignment Type of paper. Academic Level. ORDER Format Approx. Live Chat Order Now. What Our Customers Say See why thousands of students have chosen us as their custom essay writing provider. Read all testimonials. Emily, Lansing, MI. Raja, UAE. The framework is advantageous in the sense that it pragmatically focuses on the results of an action before the action is performed. It ensures nobody is treated unfairly in the aftermath of the action.
In capital punishment, a person is killed with the apparent hope that his or her death will serve justice to the offended. From the Consequentialist Ethical Framework angle, this may not be the case. The death penalty does not address crime effectively as it is purported to, and is also unethical. There can never be a humane way to kill and no matter the crime one has committed, they should not be subjected to this painful process of dying. The punishment is also not fair as some people might while others might not afford to hire quality lawyers to defend them. Moreover, it cannot be taken back and this means once persecuted, one can never regain their innocence as well as their life.
Amnesty International Australia. Bonde, S. Brow University. International Commission against death penalty. International Commission against Death Penalty. Oregonians for Alternatives to the Death Penalty. Thesis: The death penalty should be abolished because it is not one of the best methods of punishing criminals and addressing crime. The penalty does not apply fairly to all criminals as some people are left sentenced to death due to poor quality defense. The death penalty does not address crime effectively as it is purported to. com is a leading academic writing service that is dedicated to providing extra support and help to students all over the world.
Through our website, students can request for help in a diverse range of subjects and disciplines. We understand that studies are the foundation of success; yet they can be quite a challenge without extra help. Ours, therefore, is to pick up where your lecturers stop by providing you with a reliable process for meeting your academic needs. Do My Essay! Do not waste time. Get a complete paper today. Order essays, research papers, term papers, book reviews, assignments, dissertation, thesis Read more…. The Death Penalty Essay, with Outline Published by gudwriter on May 24, May 24, No Bullshit!! Get A Custom Essay Special offer! Categories: Free Essays and Research Papers.
Tags: Death Penalty Essay. gudwriter Gudwriter. Related Posts Free Essay Guides How to Write a Killer Word Essay, Examples and Outline Do My Essay! Free Essays and Research Papers Persuasive Essay: Strengthening Community Do My Essay! Free Essays and Research Papers Who Moved My Cheese? by Spencer Johnson Essay Do My Essay!
No comments:
Post a Comment